Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: [RFC] generalise scheduling classes | Date | 24 Nov 2003 22:48:57 GMT |
| |
In article <3FC0A0C2.90800@cyberone.com.au>, Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
| We still don't have an HT aware scheduler, which is unfortunate because | weird stuff like that looks like it will only become more common in future.
The idea is hardly new, in the late 60's GE (still a mainframe vendor at that time) was looking at two execution units on a single memory path. They decided it would have problems with memory bandwidth, what else is new?
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |