Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:19:52 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] generalise scheduling classes |
| |
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 10:57:54PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Class is struct sched_class in include/linux/sched.h >>Default classes are built by arch_init_sched_classes in kernel/sched.c >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w23/ >>The patch in question is this one >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w23/broken-out/sched-domain.patch >> > >There's a small terminological oddity in that "class" is usually meant >to describe policies governing a task, and "domain" system partitions >like the bits in your patch (I don't recall if they're meant to be >logical or physical). e.g. usage elsewhere would say that there is an >"interactive class", a "timesharing class", a "realtime class", and so >on. Apart from that (and I suppose it's a minor concern), this appears >relatively innocuous. >
Yeah as you see from the name of the patch as well I got a bit muddled. I think I'd better change it to sched_domain. Good point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |