Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: irq 9: nobody cared! on 2.6.0-test9 | From | Len Brown <> | Date | 23 Nov 2003 01:32:13 -0500 |
| |
> ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus[0] irq[0x9] global_irq[0x9] polarity[0x3] trigger[0x3])
This requests level/low for SCI on IRQ9
> IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (2-9 -> 0x71 -> IRQ 9 Mode:1 Active:1)
This indicates that we set IRQ9 to level/low, as requested.
Though 2.6.0 lacks the print_IO_APIC patch, so you'd need to apply this and re-collect dmesg to really confirm the IOAPIC is programmed correctly: http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.6.0-test9/
If you boot with pci=noacpi, does the system run properly (including /proc/interrupts showing ACPI interrupts when you, say, press the power button)
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1352
Though I'd love to be wrong, I think this one is a different failure. Please file a new one per below. Would also be good to verify that the latest 2.4 kernel does the same thing.
thanks, -Len
How to file a bug against ACPI:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Category: Power Management Component: ACPI
Please attach the output from dmidecode, available in /usr/sbin/, or here: http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/
Please attach the output from acpidmp, available in /usr/sbin/, or in here http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/pmtools-20010730.tar.gz
Please attach /proc/interrupts and the dmesg output showing the failure, if possible.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |