lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] seq_file version of /proc/interrupts
    Hi there.  I'm sorry it took me so long to test this.  I was able to
    get some time on our 512p system this morning. I ran the test and your
    fix does solve this problem.

    Actually, it was 511 processors at the time.

    I was going to include the output but I decied most people wouldn't want
    to stretch their windows that wide. The output isn't pretty on a system
    with this many processors - but it isn't breaking and that is the main
    concern.

    Thanks again for checking in to this. Much appreciated.

    Erik

    > > Here, anyway, is a better version of the patch. It's less intrusive,
    > > forgoes some "cleanups" I indulged in the first time, and makes it easier
    > > to update other architectures. I did x86-64, ia_64 and ppc64 just for the
    > > heck of it, but I can't test them.
    >
    > I tested your changes on a small ia64 Altix here. It worked well. I'll try
    > it out on a 512p system when I can get a time slot on it.
    >
    > Thanks for doing this.
    >
    > Erik
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >

    --
    Erik Jacobson - Linux System Software - Silicon Graphics - Eagan, Minnesota
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.024 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site