lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromAndrew Walrond <>
SubjectRe: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
DateWed, 19 Nov 2003 10:26:13 +0000
On Wednesday 19 Nov 2003 12:38 am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Presumably because he's said several times that the bk2cvs gateway
> software is based on (and requires) the commercial version of bk.  Not
> to mention that the way it generates repositories isn't really
> compatible with this model.

I was (obviously?) assuming that the bk(d) was the commercial version, but I 
don't see how that would affect the client from being o/s?

And why is this different from bk2cvs? Because then I have to rsync the cvs 
repo with all the problems (discussed at length in this thread) of getting a 
coherent local copy of the repo.

I guess it all comes back to my wanting to host my (commercial and open-
source) public code repositories with bk, but have to guarantee 100% access 
to my 'users'. 99% Isn't good enough.

I'm not, Daniel, a FSF/GPL whiner, and do not appreciate being labelled as 
such.

Andrew Walrond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008