lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities
    Hi!

    > I suppose the nice() wrapper in glibc could
    > be modified... but that's kind of silly when
    > the kernel is getting modified anyway.

    Perhaps modifying glibc is the right way after all. We do not want to
    have nice(), ionice() and then cpunice() as a kernel interface.

    OTOH it would be good to keep ionice() on the same scale as other
    "nice" values so that "do-it-all" interface is easier.

    Pavel
    --
    When do you have a heart between your knees?
    [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:2.458 / U:1.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site