![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13 2003, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Are there any cases when the last_written size is really what's wanted, > > rather than the capacity? Such as unclosed multi-session iso9660, ufs, or > > whatever else I'm ignoring? > > Yes, for packet written media. Thanks, the recent patch addresses that, I think that covers the cases which want the last_written size. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||