lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 14 Nov 2003 11:16:47 +0100
FromLars Marowsky-Bree <>
SubjectRe: [RFCI] How best to partition MD/raid devices in 2.6
On 2003-11-14T16:30:42,
   Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> said:

> There are issues with the raid superblock but assuming they can be
> solved, I want partitioning to work easily.
> 
> Can LVM work happily with 'legacy' partitioning information?

I'd really suggest to run DM (either LVM2 or EVMS2) on top of md
instead. It's much more flexible; I don't see any benefit in 'old style'
partition information, which has all sorts of problems - ie,
non-transactional updates (_why_ were you running raid again? ;), static
as they can't be modified during runtime etc.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	      \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs			      | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ 	-- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008