Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:07:03 -0800 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: why no Kconfig in "kernel" subdir? |
| |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:34:26 -0500 Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
| Randy.Dunlap wrote: | | | > I consider PREEMPT and SMP arch-specific, not generic. | | Interesting. Might I ask why? I thought that most of PREEMPT was | pretty arch-neutral.
Right, most of it is arch-neutral. It appears that PA-RISC doesn't support PREEMPT:
include/asm-parisc/hardirq.h: #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT # error CONFIG_PREEMT currently not supported. [complete with typo]
and UML doesn't support PREEMPT either.
| > Will init/Kconfig do what you want? | | As long as there is some place to put generic options that are | applicable to the system as a whole, then I'm happy.
I expect that it's workable.
-- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |