Messages in this thread | | | From | "kirk bae" <> | Subject | So, Poll is not scalable... what to do? | Date | Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:52:42 -0600 |
| |
If poll is not scalable, which method should I use when writing multithreaded socket server?
What is the most efficient model to use?
Is there a "standard" model to use when writing a scalable multithreaded socket serve such as "io completion ports" on windows?
From the "Microbenchmark comparing poll, kqueue, and /dev/poll", kqueue is the way to go. Am I correct?
What is the best solution to use on Linux?
Also, why is it that poll doesn not return with "close signal" when a thread-1 calls poll and thread-2 calls close on a sockfd1? It seems that poll only handles close signal when a client disconnects from the server. I've seen this mentioned here before, has it been fixed?
Thank you~~~
_________________________________________________________________ From Beethoven to the Rolling Stones, your favorite music is always playing on MSN Radio Plus. No ads, no talk. Trial month FREE! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |