lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: devfs vs. udev
    Date
    Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:

    >> I just hope udev can give a look/feel similar to devfs as I have quite a
    >> few machines already in production configured for devfs and really like
    >> the manageablility.
    >
    > I wonder: do you use the /dev/disc/* links, or the /dev/ide/... and
    > /dev/scsi/... constructs? I'm not sure how udev will be able to
    > support both layouts.
    >
    > Also: do you prefer a devs compatible layout, or maybe use the change
    > for a cleanup? a short list of obscurities: /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 but
    > /dev/printers/0 and /dev/tts/0 and /dev/floppy but /dev/discs etc. also
    > all floppy devices are in /dev/floopy, where each disc has is
    > /dev/discs/discN directory/symlink. I think it's a good opportunity
    > for a cleanup, but that wouldn't be compatible...

    I'm all for a cleanup. Changing things don't bother me, I just want a
    good reason.

    --
    Måns Rullgård
    mru@users.sf.net

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.022 / U:0.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site