[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: POSIX message queues
    Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > > In another words: is our implementation in the position
    > > of NGPT or better? ;-)
    > I don't understand. Why NGPT and what about "position"?

    He is asking if the work will be wasted effort that is dismissed or
    superceded, like NGPT was.

    > If you mean
    > including a solution in the runtime (librt), sure, this will happen.
    > But not before I see a solution in the official kernel.

    Speaking of librt - I should not have to link in pthreads and the
    run-time overhead associated with it (locking stdio etc.) just so I
    can use shm_open(). Any chance of fixing this?

    -- Jamie
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.018 / U:4.316 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site