[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: freed_symbols [Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]]
    On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 06:56 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > You're forgetting that what the GPL says doesn't matter if it is
    > unenforceable.

    If the licence is invalid then there exists no licence and it is an
    offence to use the software in question at _all_.

    > Remember all the people yelling at me that they can
    > reverse engineer BK in spite of any no-reverse-engineering clauses?
    > That same logic applies to the GPL, you can't have it both ways.

    I wasn't doing that yelling.

    > It doesn't matter what you think, or I think, or Linus thinks. What
    > matters is what is legal and what isn't.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.036 / U:7.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site