Messages in this thread | | | From | "P. Christeas" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test9 breaks cdrecord w. ide-scsi device | Date | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:35:44 +0200 |
| |
> Hello > > I don't really know what the problem with ide-scsi is (I'm not much of a > programmer) but is there any particular reason you're clinging to the old > ide-scsi method for CD writing? This has been broken a few times now in the > 2.5/2.6 tree. Even when it is working, it's still somewhat broken and they > know it. I have found that the maximum speed I can get is 16x using > ide-scsi in the 2.6 tree. > > There is now ide-cd writing support, and cdrecord 2 supports it. I build > that stuff modular, so I just load the ide-cd and isofs modules (modprobe > takes care of the rest). I achieve the fastest writing speeds I've ever > had, using this driver. Far better than ide-scsi or even Sleazy CD Creator > in Windows. > > In the cdrecord command, everything is the same except you use > dev=/dev/hdxx instead of the dev=x,x,x scsi target notation. For example: > > cdrecord -v speed=48 dev=/dev/hdd -data filename.iso > > Just in case you didn't know this or have never tried this. I hope it helps > you. > It's true that I hadn't tried the native ATAPI method lately. My point, however, was that there is a regression from -test8 to -test9 about cdrecord-ing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |