lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: Question on SIGFPE
    Date
    From
    Hi,
    I tried this. It says that the address is 0. And also I saw that
    it doesn't fall into any of the si_codes of SIGFPE.

    Regards
    Sreeram

    ---Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can
    change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -- Copied
    from a mail


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Magnus Naeslund(t) [mailto:mag@fbab.net]
    Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:53 PM
    To: Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala
    Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Subject: Re: Question on SIGFPE


    Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala wrote:

    > Hi,
    > We get this problem when we run it on disk on chip where linux
    > 2.4.5 is used.
    >
    > Thanks and Regards
    > Sreeram

    Since I don't know what your app is doing, it's kind of hard to know
    whats causing the problem. I still would guess on a divide by zero,
    maybe because of some timing issue.

    Use sigaction(2) to trap the signal, and then look at the
    siginfo_t->si_addr to find out where it happens.

    Or better yet, just run the program through gdb, it will catch the
    thing...

    Magnus

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.024 / U:0.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site