lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right
You don't need extended attributes, you just needs files and 
directories.... www.namesys.com/v4.html says more.

Hans

Wichert Akkerman wrote:

>Previously Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>It is true that there are many features, such as an automatic text
>>indexer, that belong in user space, but the basic indexes (aka
>>directories) and index traversal code belong in the kernel.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, but if you have a kernel which supports arbitraty extended
>attributes for files you don't need much more kernel support. You
>can implement things like metadata for files and query languages on
>top of that in userspace. If you modify applications to (also) put some
>metadata (meta tags from html pages, document properties from office
>documents, etc.) in those extended attributes you might already be where
>microsoft is going.
>
>You only would need some kernel interaction if you want to keep an
>updated index of file contents (dnotify for a while filesystem and
>reindexing whole files instead of blocks doesn't sound very attractive).
>
>Wichert.
>
>
>


--
Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.175 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site