Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:37:54 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 2.6.0-test9-mjb1 |
| |
Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:17, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>well, there's still this patch... >> void >>-e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, uint32_t port, uint32_t value) >>+e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value) >> { >> outl(value, port); >> } > > > Whoops. I just went looking in the breakout directory and didn't see it > in there. I wonder where it was hidden. > > Anton, did this come from you? Did it stop some warnings or something?
"stop some warnings"? ;) It's obviously correct -- a port address _must_ be unsigned long. Anything less is uncivilized (and a bug).
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |