lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: 2.6.0-test9-mjb1
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:17, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>well, there's still this patch...
>> void
>>-e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, uint32_t port, uint32_t value)
>>+e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
>> {
>> outl(value, port);
>> }
>
>
> Whoops. I just went looking in the breakout directory and didn't see it
> in there. I wonder where it was hidden.
>
> Anton, did this come from you? Did it stop some warnings or something?

"stop some warnings"? ;) It's obviously correct -- a port address
_must_ be unsigned long. Anything less is uncivilized (and a bug).

Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.057 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site