lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: gettimeofday resolution seriously degraded in test9
Peter Chubb wrote:
>>>>>>"Stephen" == Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> writes:
>
>
> Stephen> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:07:45 +0100 Gabriel Paubert
> Stephen> <paubert@iram.es> wrote:
>
>>>for example.
>
>
> Stephen> The suggestion of using time interpolation (like ia64) would
> Stephen> make the discontinuities smaller, but still relying on fine
> Stephen> grain gettimeofday for controlling servo loops with NTP
> Stephen> running seems risky. Perhaps what you want to use is the
> Stephen> monotonic_clock which gives better resolution (nanoseconds)
> Stephen> and doesn't get hit by NTP.
>
> monotonic_clock:
> -- isn't implemented for most architectures
> -- even for X86 only works for some timing sources
> -- and for the most common case is variable rate because of
> power management functions changing the TSC clock rate.
>
> As far as I know, there isn't a constant-rate monotonic clock
> available at present for all architectures in the linux kernel. The
> nearest thing is scheduler_clock().

What you want is the POSIX clocks and timers CLOCK_MONOTONIC which is available
on all archs (as of 2.6). The call is:

cc [ flag ... ] file -lrt [ library ... ]

#include <time.h>

int clock_gettime(clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *setting);

where you want "which_clock" to be CLOCK_MONOTONIC.


--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans