Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:36:40 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: must-fix list reconciliation |
| |
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:34:37 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: | > Hi everyone, | > As you might or might not know, the must-fix / should-fix lists have been | > inadvertently forked. We are merging them again, so please don't update | > the wiki until we have worked out what to do with them. This should be a | > day or two at most. | > | > I had the idea that maybe we could put them into the source tree, and | > encourage people to keep them up to date by making them become criteria | > for the feature and code freeze. Comments? | | I'm a little disappointed that after I spent time converting them into | the wiki form, you're now proposing abandoning them again. This seems | like a retrograde step. | | What I'd be more interested in doing is combining the must- and should- | fix lists. As a first pass, just put all the must-fix items on the | should-fix list at pri 4. One of the things I did was delete the things | that appeared on both lists. This would obviously be easier if they | were in one list ;-)
Agreed on that. I think the location is not the problem (whether source tree or wiki), it's just an extra step to keep them updated, and having no owner (or _many_ owners) often doesn't work. Is one of you (or the two of you) willing to be the owner/editor?
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |