Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:34:37 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: must-fix list reconciliation |
| |
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi everyone, > As you might or might not know, the must-fix / should-fix lists have been > inadvertently forked. We are merging them again, so please don't update > the wiki until we have worked out what to do with them. This should be a > day or two at most. > > I had the idea that maybe we could put them into the source tree, and > encourage people to keep them up to date by making them become criteria > for the feature and code freeze. Comments?
I'm a little disappointed that after I spent time converting them into the wiki form, you're now proposing abandoning them again. This seems like a retrograde step.
What I'd be more interested in doing is combining the must- and should- fix lists. As a first pass, just put all the must-fix items on the should-fix list at pri 4. One of the things I did was delete the things that appeared on both lists. This would obviously be easier if they were in one list ;-)
-- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |