Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:14:27 -0400 | From | "Robert L. Harris" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test8, oops, [__remove_from_page_cache+36/112] __remove_from_page_cache+0x24/0x70 |
| |
This sounds like what mine was doing, the oops looked similar as well (with the null pointer part atleast). Reboot and I bet it'll run fine for a while and then start up again. For me it seemed to start faulting when "free" showed over 250 Megs used.
Thus spake Jacek Kawa (jfk@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl):
> Jak podaj? anonimowe ?r?d?a, przepowiedziano, ?e Jacek Kawa napisze: > > > This machine has new RAM, but after about 7 hours of testing, > > memtest.86 didn't show any errors... > > Well, it's RAM anyway... I've just got few segfaults in vim... > > bye > > -- > Jacek Kawa > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
:wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Life is not a destination, it's a journey. Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway. Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |