Messages in this thread | | | From | "Thomas Giese" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1 | Date | Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:05:52 +0200 |
| |
this 2.6.0-mm1 is really very good,
but i would VERY enjoy to have the cloop-device from knopper in it! we have the cryptloop, why not the very good cloop?
this would be a wonderful combination?
best Regards
Thomas Giese
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: "James Simmons" <jsimmons@infradead.org> An: "Thomas Schlichter" <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> Cc: "Helge Hafting" <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>; "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>; <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <linux-mm@kvack.org> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 22:42 Betreff: Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1
> > > > This patch was fine. 2.6.0-test8 with this patch booted and > > > looked no different from plain 2.6.0-test8. I am using it for > > > writing this. The problems must be in mm1 somehow. > > > > > > Helge Hafting > > Yeah!!! > > > Well here I've got same problems for -test8 + fbdev-patch as with -test8-mm1. > > I've compiled the kernel with most DEBUG_* options enabled (all but > > DEBUG_INFO and KGDB) and see the same cursor and image corruption as with > > -mm1 and the same options enabled. > > > > Should I try compiling this kernel without the DEBUG_* options and watch if I > > get the invalidate_list Oops again? > > Yes. I'm using vesafb and I have no problems. I liek to see what the > problem really is. > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |