lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 16 Oct 2003 07:19:51 +0200
FromJan-Benedict Glaw <>
SubjectRe: Unbloating the kernel, action list
On Wed, 2003-10-15 20:16:58 +0200, Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
wrote in message <20031015181658.GA9652@iram.es>:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:10:15AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-10-14 15:56:38 -0700, cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>
> > Can you quantify the performance impact of cmov emulation (or whatever
> > it is)? I have a vague notion it could be hard given the daunting task
> > of switching userspace around to verify it.
> The other problem of the 386 is that it has a fundamental MMU flaw:
> no write protection on kernel mode accesses to user space, which makes 
> put_user() intrinsically racy on a 386 and way more bloated when it is
> inlined (access_ok has to call a function which searches the VMA tree).

However, this problem exists since the very first hour. Linux once
really ran quite well on those machines...

I've rebooted my P-Classic router last night. Maybe I can see (in two
weeks or in a month or the like...) why it slows down, even with 32MB
RAM...

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2008