[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Transparent compression in the FS
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:10:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> As Andre H and Larry McVoy love to point out, data isn't _really_ secure
> until it's been checksummed, and that checksum data is verified on
> reads. LM has an anecdote (doesn't he always? <g>) about how BitKeeper
> -- which checksums its data inside the app -- has found data-corrupting
> kernel bugs, in days long past.

yes, even a fs checksum won't protect against kernel bugs randomly
corrupting pagacache, and that's why having it in userspace is
preferable IMHO (though in userspace it's more difficult to switch it
off transparently unless the app is designed for that).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.211 / U:14.820 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site