[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Transparent compression in the FS
    > Erik Mouw writes:
    > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:50:38PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
    > > > Erik Mouw writes:
    > > > > Nowadays disks are so incredibly cheap, that transparent compression
    > > > > support is not realy worth it anymore (IMHO).
    > > You have a point, but remember that modern IDE drives can do about
    > > 50MB/s from medium. I don't think you'll find a CPU that is able to
    > > handle transparent decompression on the fly at 50MB/s, even not with a
    > > simple compression scheme as used in NTFS (see the NTFS docs on
    > > SourceForge for details).

    I haven't got the original message (mail problems) so I'm responding here.

    I misread your message, and thought you said compression.
    My Duron 1300 (hardly the fastest machine) compresses (gzip -1) at around
    40Mb/sec (repetitive log-files that compress to 5% using gzip -1) and
    10Mb/sec on text (compressing to 40%).

    On expansion, it decompresses compressed text at around 14Mb/sec (resulting
    in 30Mb/sec, around my disk speed), and logfiles at 110Mb/sec, which is
    significantly faster.

    This is with a single stick of PC133 RAM, and a tiny 64K cache.
    I would be very surprised if even a high end consumer machine couldn't handle
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.020 / U:5.716 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site