Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:40:57 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: ReiserFS patch for updating ctimes of renamed files |
| |
I looked again at the definition of the difference between ctime and mtime on the stat man page, and I think that updating ctime in response to rename is as reasonable as updating it in response to changing the number of links.
Ok, we will conform, and I will accept the kindly donated patch, along with Andrew's optimization of our evaluation of CURRENT_TIME. vs, please add Andrew's suggested optimization and sent the result through QA. Thanks to all for your good advice.
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |