Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:30:56 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: ReiserFS patch for updating ctimes of renamed files |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote: > > >>do you think schultz's arguments about why it is wrong are correct? >>They seem well thought out to me. >> >> > >Well given that you've renamed the file, you do want the backup program to >pick up the "new" file. But it'd be a pretty lame backup program which was >fooled by a missing ctime update. > >Yes, John has a point but we're not going to go and change all the other >filesystems (are we?). > > > > > why not? It is correct therefor....
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |