lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kfree_skb() bug in 2.4.22
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:53:44 +0200
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de> wrote:

> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 15:47, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:09:48 -0400
> >
> > Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > I would prefer that you fix your code instead, to not pass NULL to
> > > kfree_skb()...
> >
> > Absolutely, there is no valid reason to pass NULL into these
> > routines.
>
> Would you mind __attribute_nonnull__ for these functions, if we
> enable GCC 3.3 support for this[1]?

I would say yes, but why? All this attribute does is optimize
away tests for NULL which surprise surprise we don't have any
of in kfree_skb().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.044 / U:3.624 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site