lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.0-test6
On Tue, 30 September 2003 11:17:51 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] J?rn Engel wrote:
> >
> > How is this better than adding "-H", as Jamie suggested?
>
> I didn't see that in Linus' post, and still don't. I suspect you're
> thinking of some post which came later. Linus asked for ideas, I supplied
> one, sorry it offends you.

Ok, my bad.

I wasn't offended, just curious, which one of the suggestions would be
the best. Jamie's idea of using -H looks better to me than yours, but
maybe I have missed something, so I asked.

For some reason, I often miss the tone. Any emotional stuff in my
posts is unintended, useless and should be removed before sending.
Sorry!

Jörn

PS: So, does your idea have advantages over Jamie's that I missed?

--
"Translations are and will always be problematic. They inflict violence
upon two languages." (translation from German)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.101 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site