Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:08:17 +0200 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6 |
| |
On Tue, 30 September 2003 11:17:51 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] J?rn Engel wrote: > > > > How is this better than adding "-H", as Jamie suggested? > > I didn't see that in Linus' post, and still don't. I suspect you're > thinking of some post which came later. Linus asked for ideas, I supplied > one, sorry it offends you.
Ok, my bad.
I wasn't offended, just curious, which one of the suggestions would be the best. Jamie's idea of using -H looks better to me than yours, but maybe I have missed something, so I asked.
For some reason, I often miss the tone. Any emotional stuff in my posts is unintended, useless and should be removed before sending. Sorry!
Jörn
PS: So, does your idea have advantages over Jamie's that I missed?
-- "Translations are and will always be problematic. They inflict violence upon two languages." (translation from German) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |