Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:31:52 -0800 | From | Aaron Lehmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Define hash_mem in lib/hash.c to apply hash_long to an arbitraty piece of memory. |
| |
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:03:28PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > I did a little testing and found that on a list of 2 million > basenames from a recent backup index (800,000 unique): > > hash_mem (as included here) is noticably faster than HASH_HALF_MD4 or > HASH_TEA: > > hash_mem: 10 seconds > DX_HASH_HALF_MD4: 14 seconds > DX_HASH_TEA: 15.2 seconds
I'm curious how the hash at http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html would fare. He has a 64-bit version at http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/c/lookup8.c. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |