![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:03:28PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > I did a little testing and found that on a list of 2 million > basenames from a recent backup index (800,000 unique): > > hash_mem (as included here) is noticably faster than HASH_HALF_MD4 or > HASH_TEA: > > hash_mem: 10 seconds > DX_HASH_HALF_MD4: 14 seconds > DX_HASH_TEA: 15.2 seconds I'm curious how the hash at http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html would fare. He has a 64-bit version at http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/c/lookup8.c. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||