lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!)
At 12:38 AM 7/01/2003 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > What was the underlying error rate and distribution you assumed? I
> > figure if it were high enough to get to your 1%, you'd have such high
> > retry rates (and resulting throughput loss) that the operator would
> > notice his LAN was broken weeks before said transfer completed.
>
>The average ISP wouldn't notice things were broken unless enough magic
>smoke escaped to cause a Halon dump.
>
>Consider as evidence the following NANOG presentation:
>http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/wessels.html
>
>Some *98* percent of all queries at one of the root nameservers over a 24-hour
>period were broken in some way.

please don't confuse issues.
i think you just epitomized the quote: "there are lies, damn lies, and
statistics".

you're trying to say that because there is some broken/buggy nameserver
code out there, it means that the error-rate for TCP is correct?


cheers,

lincoln.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.390 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site