[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Gauntlet Set NOW!
        But sometimes we can't make things free, either because it comes to close 
    to core IP which we are legally bound to protect, or because it's a derived
    work of something we bought and don't ourselves have the right to

    At this level of generality, I can only say that if the program is to
    be published as non-free software, it will not be available to people
    to use in freedom. Its effect will be to tempt people to give up
    their freedom. If I had a choice to develop that program or no
    program, I would develop no program.

    I would rather look for constructive alternatives than just criticize.
    In such a situation, I would look for a way to make the program free.
    This scenario is too general to get started on that. (I explained in
    another message how the term "intellectual property" tends to obscure
    important distinctions; this is an example.) In any specific case
    there is likely to be some way.

    If there is no easy way to make the same program free, there may be a
    harder way. People who value freedom strongly sometimes choose the
    hard path to freedom rather than the easy path that extends
    non-freedom. That is how we extend freedom.

    As an ultimate fallback, there is surely some other job you could do

    Linus has made it quite clear in the past that his position on binary
    modules is that they are explicitly allowed, but that the maintainers of
    such a thing 'get everything they deserve' in terms of maintenance hassle.

    Linus has the right to permit this, with his code, and so do other
    contributors to Linux. In the GNU Project we usually don't permit
    this, and the FSF believes the GPL does not in general permit it, but
    occasionally we make an exception when it seems best to do so.

    I have no opinion yet about what Andre said, because I cannot form a
    clear picture of what he plans to do; I don't know whether it would
    violate the GPL, or whether the issue would involve the FSF. We do
    not enforce the GPL for Linux in any case; that is the responsibility
    of the copyright holders of Linux.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.020 / U:5.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site