lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest
Date
On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 9:21 am, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Actually the most "felt" of these loads is io_load and based on these
> results: io_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2559ext3 3 109 68.8 4 10.1 1.40
> 2559jfs 3 138 54.3 11 13.8 1.77
> 2559reiser 3 98 76.5 2 9.2 1.24
> 2559xfs 3 124 60.5 6 8.0 1.57
>

Here is a set of dbench_load results:
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2559ext3 3 115 65.2 3 24.3 1.47
2559jfs 3 123 61.8 3 19.5 1.58
2559reiser 3 108 69.4 3 13.9 1.37
2559xfs 3 118 63.6 3 22.0 1.49

Note the order correlates with the order of the io_load results.

Once again reiserfs held up kernel compilation the least. Note they all
accomplished the same work in that time though.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans