Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59-mm7 with contest | Date | Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:13:36 +1100 |
| |
On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 10:01 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > ... > > io_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.59 3 153 50.3 8 13.7 1.94 > > 2.5.59-mm6 2 90 83.3 2 6.7 1.15 > > 2.5.59-mm7 5 110 68.2 2 6.4 1.41 > > read_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.59 3 102 76.5 5 4.9 1.29 > > 2.5.59-mm6 3 733 10.8 56 6.3 9.40 > > 2.5.59-mm7 4 90 84.4 1 1.3 1.15 > > The background loads took some punishment.
Yes and I'd say a ratio of only 1.15 suggests kernel compilation got an unfair share of the resources. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |