[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: downtime
    > Actually, with BK it should be possible to have read only clones on
    > multiple servers, should it not?

    Oh, sure. Even if we were down for a week, the trees which people care
    about are almost certainly on their local disks so they could set up
    servers all over the place make the data available if need be. is a cache, it's not the authoritative source of anything.

    > I wonder if any of the mirror sites would be interested in
    > hosting a clone of one or more BK repositories.

    Eventually we'll have a version of the BKD that we've bullet proofed
    enough that we'd encourage that. For the time being we've encouraged
    hosting at simply because (a) the infrastructure is there
    and (b) if there are security problems then it's our mess not yours.

    It's partially self interest: if got compromised and it was
    our fault then we'd get a black eye. If bkbits got compromised we'd
    just fix it up quietly (and, no, so far it has never been broken into
    but that's probably because we're very careful about how we run things,
    even if you got in via BKD you'd have no write permissions on anything
    but tmp dirs).
    Larry McVoy lm at
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.021 / U:46.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site