![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:37:38PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 05:28:25PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > > > > > Some got missed off the first time: > > > > What kernel this is tested with? What method used? These don't look like > > Set2 codes AT ALL. > > The kernel is 2.4.20. The keycode is the output from showkey, and the > make and break codes are the output from showkey -s. > > Should I have used I8042_DEBUG_IO instead? :-/ With 2.5, yes, that'd be much better. And yet better it'd be if you'd have used the "i8042_direct=1" kernel option, and for set3 the "atkbd_set=3" option. I'm sorry to tell you after you wrote it all down, but these are set1 scancodes you see. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||