![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> > I've heard some say that O(1) sched can only really help on systems with >> > lots and lots of processes. >> > >> > But my systems run about 600 processes max, but are P4 Xeons with HT, >> > and we kick off several hundred processes sometimes. (sleeping to >> > running then back) based on things happening in the system. >> > >> > I am possibly going to forgo putting O(1)sched in production *right now* >> > until I've got my patch solid. But I got to thinking, do I need it at >> > all on a Oracle VLDB? >> > >> > I think yes, but I wanted to get some opinions/facts before making that >> > choice to go without O(1) sched. >> >> How many *processors*? Real ones. > > Quad P4 Xeon. Dell 6650 I'd say you definitely want O(1) sched then (or just run -aa or something). But why don't you just try it and see? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||