lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.59_lost-tick_A0
john stultz wrote:
>
> All,
> This patch addresses the following problem: Linux cannot properly
> handle the case where interrupts are disabled for longer then two ticks.
>

Question is: who is holding interrupts off for so long?

It might be better to implement a detection scheme inside
the timer interrupt handler: if the time since last interrupt
exceeds two ticks, whine and drop a backtrace.

That backtrace will point up into the local_irq_enable() in
the offending code, and we can go fix it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site