[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?

    > First, I would in fact prefer to have the version control
    > information to make changes. The commit comments, for example, may
    > explain the rationale for changes.

    These comments are not part of the source. The source has its own comments.
    They are helpful when you try to track the changes, but GPL doesn't require
    releasing the tracking record of a GPL project. It only requires releasing
    whole source (or diff).

    The argument that "BK hosts GPL project so BK has to be GPL'd" is also
    ridiculous. If so, let's GPL all disks that store any bit of GPL code,
    firmware and hardware/chip specs. Then where would we end up? Right,
    you cannot find anywhere to host any GPL projects. So it's essentially
    killing GPL in the name of purifying and defending it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.018 / U:19.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site