[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.5] hangcheck-timer
    On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:40:02AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:

    > > I'm puzzled. What does this do that softdog.c doesn't ?
    > First, softdog.c requires userspace interaction. Second, softdog.c
    > relies on jiffies. If the system goes out to lunch via udelay() or
    > another hardware call that freezes the CPUs for a bit, jiffies does not
    > increment. The system could be frozen for two minutes (qla2x00 used to
    > do this for 90 seconds) and softdog.c never notices, because jiffies
    > hasn't counted a single second during this time.

    Ok, seems to make sense now, thanks.
    Wouldn't this belong under drivers/char/watchdog too though ?
    It seems very 'watchdog-ish' to me.


    | Dave Jones.
    | SuSE Labs
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.395 / U:7.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site