![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > the attached patch (against 2.5.59) is my current scheduler tree, it
> > includes two main areas of changes:
> >
> > - interactivity improvements, mostly reworked bits from Andrea's tree and
> > various tunings.
> >
>
> Thanks for doing this. Initial testing with one workload which is extremely
> bad with 2.5.59: huge improvement.
>
Initial testing on my NUMA box looks good. So far, I only have
kernbench numbers, but the system time shows a nice decrease,
and the CPU % busy time has gone up.
Kernbench:
Elapsed User System CPU
ingoD7-59 28.944s 285.008s 79.998s 1260.8%
stock59 29.668s 283.762s 82.286s 1233%
I'll try to get more testing in over the next few days.
There was one minor build error introduced by the patch:
#define NODE_THRESHOLD 125
was removed, but the NUMA code uses this.
--
Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486
hohnbaum@us.ibm.com T/L 775-5486
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [W:0.684 / U:0.450 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||