Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:41:58 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? |
| |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
> I submit that it is impossible to comply with the GPL and > distribute binaries if the preferred form of a work for the purposes of > making modifications to it is in a proprietary file format. This is > tantamount to encrypting the source.
You'll have to find another project to prove your idea, though.
Bitkeeper is using the AT&T SCCS format (plus compression) to store its data and metadata. People are working on scripts to extract the source from a bitkeeper tree without using the bitkeeper software.
cheers,
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |