![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In message <20030101.211536.121172392.davem@redhat.com> you write: > From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:58:36 -0800 > > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 08:50:03PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think this is to get .foo.init sections. > > Obviously. Perhaps the question was worded badly. Instead read > it as "Why don't we force this to be called .init.foo instead?" > > This new naming order was created recently, but I forget the reason. > It used to be .init.foo No, it used to be .foo.init, but -ffunction-sections calls its functions <funcname>.init, so it was changed to .init.foo. Of course, the simpler prefix test should now be sufficient. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [W:0.216 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||