lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 02 Jan 2003 01:26:40 -0600
From"Andrew S. Johnson" <>
SubjectRe: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......
Paul Rolland wrote:
> Well, I did made another kernel without ACPI and with APM, 
> and it is working fine.

Did you try using acpi=no-idle in your kernel append line (if using
lilo) and see what difference that makes?  It works in 2.4.

Andy Johnson

> > To summarize :>  - ACPI Enumeration only is fine
>  - More functionnalities from ACPI is bad.
> 
> If someone has an idea and wants me to make tests, please contact
> me...
> 
> Regards,
> Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008