lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 1 Jan 2003 23:56:03 -0700
FromErik Andersen <>
SubjectRe: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
On Thu Jan 02, 2003 at 06:48:33AM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> I say we start a driver based on the UTAHs. MR. Anderson had 
> a good schedule :), knock knock neo... ;-))
And I live in Utah.  ;-) Seriously though, that schedule would
only be feasible given enough human resources -- and given either
source code or proper docs for their chipsets, which relies on
Nvidia playing nice and kindly choosing to share.

Relying on guesswork and/or reverse engineering without proper
vendor cooperation, which is exactly the case with the Utah GLX
driver, it'll take a much longer time and will likely not attract
the same amount of human resources as a result.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008