lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 16 Jan 2003 08:42:40 -0200 (BRST)
FromRik van Riel <>
SubjectRe: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (YAWN)
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> Have you ever pondered the question why some of the new code in 2.5 is
> coming up with a dual-license of OSL/GPL ?  Is it because OSL has some
> meaningful terms understood by the courts?  Is it because the folks at OSI
> understand a bigger picture?

For the people who haven't found it yet, the OSL can be
found here:

http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl.php

I like this license a lot; to my untrained eye it seems
to give much more protection than the GPL.

> 	Richard, is there a way to make OSL and GPL compatable ?
> 	Richard, will you allow OSL and GPL to coexist ?
> 	Richard, can OSL superceed GPL ?
> 	Richard, can you agree there may be a better license than GPL ?
> 	Richard, if people want to develop under OSL, what are the results
> 		of the combined work?
> 	Richard, if GPL can be improved by the adoption of OSL ideas,
> 		what benefits are there to you idea to holding onto the
> 		past?

Interesting questions, I hope Richard will answer them.

regards,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008