lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 16 Jan 2003 06:59:33 +0000
FromBrian Kelly <>
SubjectRe: How to setup a buffer_head in a driver
I wrote:
 > I'm writing a device driver that among other things needs to write data,
 > manufactured by the driver itself, to a block device.
 >
 > I have this data in block sized kmalloc()'d chunks. So what I'm doing is
 > allocating a struct buffer_head, initialising it, fill out it's various
 > fields and send it to generic_make_request().

Andrew Morton wrote:
 >It's probably better to use submit_bh().  Set the BH_Lock and BH_Mapped bits,
 >also set up b_end_io.  Then do a wait_on_buffer(), wait for the IO to
 >complete.  There's some similar code in
 >fs/jbd/journal.c:journal_write_metadata_buffer().

Thanks, that's exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.

 >However, what you're doing is an odd thing.  If there is already pagecache
 >against that block device then the kernel doesn't know that you've changed
 >the bytes on-disk and will cheerfully proceed to use (and write out) the
 >cached data.  You'll lose your modifications..
 >
 >It would be better to use sb_getblk() or bread(), to lock the returned
 >buffer_head, then copy your data into it and to then write it back with
 >submit_bh() or ll_rw_block().  Or just leave it dirty and let the kernel
 >write it out in due course.

Fair enough, that seems like the right thing to do so I'll look into it.

Thanks,

Brian
-- 
bkelly@sulaco.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008