![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:39:34PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > more I tried to add to it. Also there were subtle things happening in the > BASH version that made for much more variation in results than this version. I agree, it had begun to outgrow it's bash roots (e.g. i think it was the ratio section with variables named a b c d e which drove me nuts when I couldn't figure out which one was giving me a zero value). > Possibly but clearly c has no major limitations once the hard part (the > wrapper for the other applications) has been done. I would disagree. For example, playing tricks with strings, pipes/redirects and files in C is a complete pain, compared with perl/python. Most of the things I changed with the orignal bash version were in this subset, and it allowed me to customise it for what we were doing quickly and easily. -i ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||