![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:20, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > It is not, as you say; "obviously wrong". It is, in fact correct. > If you think you will get, as previously stated, the current status > by reading the status register of a device, while a posted-write > is in-progress, the code is broken. There are warnings all over > PCI device hardware specifications about this. Can you point me to such a warning in the PCI2.1 or 2.2 spec please ? Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||