![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:24:40PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > Dave: Anton suggested you might have a justification for > __cacheline_aligned doing something on UP? > > I think I'd prefer __cacheline_aligned to be the same as > __cacheline_aligned_in_smp, and have a new __cacheline_aligned_always > for those who REALLY want it (if any). See the recent thread on tg3 and cacheline_aligned for David's description... I and one other did some performance measurements and ____cacheline_aligned proved useful even on UP... sigh. I wish I had caught you on IRC. Don't you think changing the meaning of cacheline_aligned, and adding a new __cacheline_aligned_always to mean what it used to, is completely pointless churn?? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||